Category Archives: books

Late Night With the Devil (2023) & Abigail (2024) with bonus mention of Mr. Magic (2023) & I Saw the TV Glow (2024)

I don’t think I could explain the never-ending life-chaos of the last year if I wanted to, but suffice to say my rudely interrupted Christmas Horror series is all polished up and in the queue…for December 2024.

I’ve abandoned any delusions of intricate multi-part thematic series posts in the near and, while I have so many complicated things cooking offline, am returning (temporarily) to the short review/reaction essay format of yore. Because a full site redesign is one of the many things in flux right now, I’m going to append trailers at the bottom of the post because they’re creating so much formatting chaos I’m starting to think I have a ghost in the machine.

I can tell you one thing for sure: horror film and literature has been an embarrassment of riches lately.

Two films I’ve been looking forward to popped up on subscription streaming services and/or VOD sooner than I expected. I am not complaining. Late Night With the Devil (2023) debuted on Shudder on April 19, the theatrical release date for Abigail (2024), although I didn’t actually see Abigail until this past weekend.

In Late Night With the Devil, Writers/Directors Cameron and Colin Cairnes present us with a found footage homage to Ghost Watch (1992), The Exorcist II (1977), 1970s late night TV talkshows, and the Satanic Panic which never entirely dissipates in the US. Purporting to be a reconstruction of a live 1977 Halloween broadcast intended to boost host Jack Delroy’s (David Dastmalchian) trailing ratings, the narrative integrates broadcast and behind-the-scenes documentary footage to show us the catastrophic consequences of Delroy’s hunger for success. Dastmalchian’s performance and the masterful mise en scène have, deservedly, garnered quite a lot of praise and attention. The rushed and slightly incoherent third act has also garnered a lot of attention, albeit minus the acclaim. Ditto the controversy regarding 3 AI generated interstitial images which appear during Delroy’s show.

(joke about the devil being in the details deleted in a rare display of self-control)

I’m less interested here in the messy bits here. Instead, I want to take a moment to praise Ingrid Torelli’s performance as Lilly. Torelli does a bang-up job channeling the 1970s vibe of the possessed child manifesting a demon under hypnosis, but what I found chilling were the moments when Lilly is a polite and composed child who stares down the camera lens, seeming to pierce the souls of the viewers tuning in to watch Delroy’s live spectacle. I found Lilly’s uncanny awareness of which camera is live both amusing and disquieting.

Found footage writers and filmmakers have long leveraged the rise of indie creators such as Youtubers, livestreamers, and podcasters to their advantage. Not having to contrive a journalistic backstory or mimic specific televisual elements can allow for greater freedom. Nevertheless, the medium of television remains a rich source, particularly for cosmic or supernatural horror.

I Saw the TV Glow (2024) opens wide theatrically this week. While I likely won’t get a chance to see it until it arrives on streaming/VOD, I might occupy a little of that time with a reread of Kiersten White’s delightfully creepy 2023 novel, Mr. Magic.

Without spoilers, Mr. Magic is about a phenomenally popular 90s kids show that everyone remembers but of which no one can find footage. I’m continuously surprised that I still find it surprising how much work it still is to research television and how much once-wildly popular programming – even clips – simply isn’t anywhere to be found online. Reading Mr. Magic makes this feel vaguely sinister. I mean, you can certainly argue that it’s sinister the way we underfund archives and repositories and how little attention we pay to media conservation and preservation and how many impediments there are to digitizing and cataloging content, even without the complicated issues around posting anything corporately owned in a manner both legal and equitable.

But that’s depressing and not nearly as much fun as thinking about demons.

And speaking of demons. Abigail. Holy cats and kittens, this is a fun movie! As the trailer makes abundantly clear, the plot involves kidnappers (played by Melissa Barrera, Dan Stevens, Kathryn Newton, William Catlett, Angus Cloud, and Kevin Durand) getting more than they bargained for when Lambert (Giancarlo Esposito) asks them to kidnap a young girl (Alisha Weir). Fans often complain about trailers with spoilers, but here Universal seems almost playful in the way they supply a trailer that basically dares you to go into the film believing you know too much. The film unspools its twists and wrinkles at a steady clip and the internal logic is pretty solid. Solid enough, at any rate.


Abigail (2024)


Late Night With the Devil (2023)


I Saw the TV Glow (2024)

Elizabeth Hand’s A Haunting on the Hill (2023)

This is a spoiler-free lightly revised version of the brief review of Elizabeth Hand’s A Haunting on the Hill (2023) that I posted on Goodreads.

Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House is a beloved novel whose fans have opinions. Strong opinions. Having published one of the critical essays on Hill House in editor Kristopher Woofter’s Bram Stoker Award nominated essay collection Shirley Jackson: A Companion (2021), I also have strong opinions.

One might even say I can be a huge ass about Hill House.

Yes, one might say that.

Nevertheless, I’m an Elizabeth Hand fan and I understood A Haunting on the Hill to be set in Jackson’s Hill House but not an attempt to retell the original story or rewrite the house’s history, so I think I was pretty open-minded going in – despite the fact that Hand’s premise puts a playwright and a bunch of actors in the house to workshop a new play.

Okay, cards on the table. Having, in my youth – wrangled actors in allegedly haunted locations for a lot less money than the whole melodramatic experience was worth, I did have a couple reservations about the premise while waiting for my copy to arrive.

I thought Hand did a nice job or incorporating a number of turns of phrase of details into the story that generally go unremarked on even by ardent Hill House fans, and I look forward to a careful reread and perhaps a conversation with Hand someday because I’m certain there are details gleaned from early drafts of Jackson’s novel that one would only know by sitting down at the Library of Congress and digging in to Shirley’s papers and that delights me, whether Hand did that work or merely channeled Shirley, the result is great fun. But honestly, it was the moment when we learned that Hand’s character Amanda drove a Morris Minor that fully opened my heart, as I can’t see one of those sleek little sports cars without thinking about how much Shirley Jackson loved her own Morris and what a terror she was reputed to be behind the wheel.

(Without spoilers) there were a few elements I wish Hand had developed a bit more and I was tempted to give A Haunting on the Hill 4 stars. but the fact that I devoured it in a day and that (surprisingly early on) I quit picturing the characters as people I know and simply heard them as their own individual selves inclined me to push this up to 5 stars.

A Haunting on the Hill stands on its own, and readers unacquainted with Jackson’s work or any of the fanciful film or television adaptations which stray from the source material but lend a certain familiarity to the story won’t have any trouble getting lost in this creepy house along with Hand’s cast of characters. I can see how fans of Jackson’s work may take umbrage with the conceit Hand offers, but I think it’s worth remembering that Jackson’s Hill House was a place seemingly with a will of its own. From my perspective, the most tantalizing descriptions of that power are offered to us from the perspectives of unreliable narrators and willful women pushing back against the constricting machinations of patriarchy and capitalism and heteronormativity. Hand operates in the same register as Jackson in this regard, and her Hill House is an engaging and alluring and repellent place well worth visiting this Halloween season.

Horrorstör ruined my laundry rack

Grady Hendrix: Horrorstör

Grady Hendrix’s Horrorstör is clever in all the right ways, but it’s also quite creepy. You can’t ask for much more from a high-concept horror novel.

It’s a little too creepy and clever, honestly.

I used to love our IKEA clothes drying rack. It folds flat and stores neatly in a nook in the laundry room, but it’s quick and easy to set it up and it holds several loads of laundry at once.

“Love” might be over-stating my relationship to any of our household accoutrements, but it’s safe to say I liked this thing a lot. Liked. Past tense.

Horrorstör ruined my laundry rack for me.

IKEA Mulig drying rack

Ever since I finished the book I’ve been utterly and completely creeped out by the laundry rack. I’m not kidding. I have such a visceral reaction to the thing that I avoid doing laundry until Husband can set the rack up for me.

This is ridiculous, not least of which because there isn’t a drying rack in the book.

Nevertheless, I’m looking forward to the TV series, particularly since it’s being developed by Gail Berman, who was responsible for developing both Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel for television.

Berman did, however, Executive Produce a couple episodes of Dig, which was truly abysmal in ways that even the narcotics and other assorted drugs I was on while recovering from a long and serious illness couldn’t improve. Seriously, even for television, that was some seriously ridiculous pop culture archaeology. Let’s just hope she learned her lesson from that debacle, because damn. Just…damn.

Our monkey butler made me do it

I was out at the local coffeeshop not caulking the bathtub in our guest bathroom when I ran into a friend who asked me why I wasn’t at home re-caulking the bathtub like I said I was going to be.

I’ve been avoiding re-caulking that bathtub for 6 weeks. I’ve spent more time talking about re-caulking the bathtub than any human ever spent actually re-caulking a bathtub.

All the messy stuff – the cleaning and scraping – has been done for ages. I just have to squoosh the caulk onto the places where you have to have caulk to, um, keep the bad things from happening. (Still not Martha Stewart, in case you were under the delusion I was actually getting the hang of this shit).

I told my friend I was off the home improvement hook because I’d taught our monkey butler how to caulk.

The woman at the next table flipped out, because caulk is toxic and I shouldn’t be letting an animal handle it without supervision.

I think any animal cruelty issues here would begin and end with the words “monkey butler,” but she left in a furious huff before I could explain that our monkey butler is, to the best of my knowledge, a complete figment of our imagination.

I think I should maybe try to remember to let Husband know that some of the neighbors may think we’re terrible people who have a monkey butler.

I’m starting to think that Popemania is making people a little crazier than usual. Soon after, while I was still at the coffee shop and still not caulking the bathtub, a person I’ve never laid eyes on before marched up to our table and accused me of breaking into a warehouse and stealing a copy of Jenny Lawson’s new book, because it’s not being released until tomorrow but I clearly had a copy right there in my non-caulking hands. (Wait…Was she suggesting that The Bloggess has her own warehouse? I really need to read more of her blog, don’t I?)


furiouslyImage: a not-stolen copy of Jenny Lawson’s
“Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things.”

I also think it would be awesome to have a monkey butler, even though Jungle Pete has been berating me about how this is a terrible idea since we were 12 years old. And he’s absolutely right, but I hate admitting he’s right.

I don’t actually hate admitting Jungle Pete is right, but originally there was a punchline that depended on a setup wherein I admitted to hating to admit I’m right to Jungle Pete. It wasn’t funny so I scrapped it. I don’t know why I left this part in the post. What can I say? I’ve spent the better part of the year desperately ill and then impatiently trying to recover and I may have broken the part of my brain that remembered how to blog.

I do, however, hate how much I secretly wish we had a monkey butler. Even though I think keeping captive primates in your home is a terrible thing.

(But…monkey butler).

In other news, I still haven’t cracked open The Bloggess’s new book, but it took less than 20 minutes to re-caulk the bathtub. It probably would have only taken 10 minutes, but I had to go upstairs to retrieve the paper towels and I procrastinated for a few more minutes by emptying the dishwasher.

Plus, I couldn’t avoid re-caulking any longer because we have a guest arriving on Wednesday (who isn’t the Pope) who will probably want to take a shower or two sometime over the next week and probably wouldn’t be too keen on my caulk-avoiding alternate plan, which was to spray her with the hose in the backyard.

With our luck, that would be the moment animal control shows up to investigate monkey butler allegations.

On the subject of primates: Curious George, monkey or ape?

As a child, I ran a bit hot and cold on the whole Curious George issue. I loved him when I was 5 and devoured all the books in short order (I was a precocious reader). In the first grade, much to the chagrin of our school librarian, I found the situation of a monkey in an urban environment problematic. Which was odd considering I lived in a weird place that – in addition to the wide-range of eccentrics, roadside attractions, and sanctuaries, was the winter home of the circus – and didn’t give much thought to the variety of exotic animals all over town.

In the present, discussions erupt now and again in the MeanLouise Lair about whether George is a monkey or an ape. Sometimes other people are involved in these debates, other times I’m just talking to myself.

I think we can retire the subject once and for all because bioanthropology blogging heart-throb Kristina Killgrove has written a truly fab post on her blog, Powered by Osteons, that explores the question, “Is Curious George a Monkey or an Ape?” in fascinating detail.

I bet the Fabulous Miss P. and Heather will both find the post interesting, if not for the science than for the cultural context of those books.

precious. precocious. one of those. my proofreader failed me today ;-)