Abita

Abita is a haunting animated short that portrays the impact of the Fukushima tragedy on the children in the region.

Abita from Shoko Hara on Vimeo.

This film, which has such a clean and simple visual style, grows more haunting with repeated viewings. The sound design is particularly beautiful.

The filmmakers chose the dragonfly because it is symbolic of the island of Japan. They write, in answer to a viewer’s question about the symbolism, that the dragonfly “…symbolizes hope, perspective, dream, energy in Japan and it unites all the natural elements like water, earth and air….The Dragonfly represents the innerworld of the child, that it wants to be free in nature, but it can’t.”

Abita is a Graduate Thesis film by Shoko Hara and Paul Brenner.

New readers may be unaware of an incident in the Fall when “activists” (read: profiteers and hucksters) set their sights on my blog. Promoting fish farming in the Great Lakes with hysterical propaganda about the dangers of eating fish caught by indigenous commercial fisheries in the Pacific Northwest, making false or unverified health claims in an effort to sell affluent California parents anti-radiation pills for their children, and propagating a reframing of the nuclear disaster as an insidious plot to poison America topped the trolling topics hit parade.

In all of that noise, the plight of the vulnerable populations closest to the disaster are easily forgotten.

Never Joke About Military Flying Snake Research

“Aerodynamics of the flying snake Chrysopelea paradisi: how a bluff body cross-sectional shape contributes to gliding performance.”

This research was partially supported by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) grant W911NF1010040 to J.J.S. and P.P.V.

I guess it turns out it wasn’t a secret.

—–
Holden, Daniel, John J. Socha, Nicholas D. Cardwell, and Pavlos P. Vlachos. “Aerodynamics of the flying snake Chrysopelea paradisi: how a bluff body cross-sectional shape contributes to gliding performance.” Journal of Experimental Biology. (217):382-394. (available February 1, 2014)

Trolls, Wild West Romanticism, & Closed Comments

trollI’m closing the comments but reserving the right to re-open them at a later date.

The comments you don’t ever see because I don’t even approve them aren’t constructive, useful, or worth the time I spend reading them.

I have a lot of funny, smart, insightful readers. They tell me they rarely comment because they fear the trolls. That makes me sad.

This blog is mostly a sketchpad for popular culture musings, outbursts about squirrels, and observations on the small absurdities of life. I rarely blog about my research on online communications, but I have to mention that I’m fascinated by the arguments trolls make for their behavior.

A perpetual favorite of mine is the nostalgic re-appropriation of American West mythology into a “Ye Olde Internet as Frontier” argument – a popular argument for maintaining the status quo in many domains, to be sure, but even more ridiculous, in my opinion, when applied to blogging.

“Our communication style (read: swarming schoolyard bullying) used to be the norm when the Internet was like the Wild West (read: people who had the privilege/financial ability to be online had a megaphone and majority for shouting down minority groups online) but now it’s all puppies and rainbows online (read: people call them on their shit) and we’re the only ones still speaking Truth.”

Simply because there are people pushing back against you now doesn’t make you a persecuted minority.

“I got away with it then, I should get away with it now!” is a poor justification for being a jackass. Anywhere. Full stop.

And, to be clear, adopting these tactics to troll trolls is, in my opinion, a bad practice.

Communications research is increasingly bearing out the hypothesis that trolling commenters are becoming bolder, more aggressive, and that their presence affects the ability of other readers to critically evaluate the information they read.

Curious about this? Here’s a fascinating study to get you started, from the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication: “The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies” (Ashley A. Anderson, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Peter Ladwig. Article first published online: 19 FEB 2013 DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12009).

My decision to cut off the comments is based on the less high-minded fact that I just don’t have the energy or patience to wade through all of the misogyny, creationism, and anti-science hysteria to decide what to approve and what to moderate.

You can still reach me on twitter, and I hope this change doesn’t end up being permanent, but for now that’s just the way it’s got to be.

Devil Baby

I’ve been ignoring the links to the devil baby video on facebook because, up until a few minutes ago, I thought it was a promotional stunt for an energy drink. Apparently, based on how hard Husband is laughing at me, this is not the case. I think babies are demonic and I watch horror movies, so, um, maybe the marketing team was a little too oblique in their approach.

I suppose they’ve succeeded on some level, in that I’m sharing it. So, um, there you go. I guess.

Dr. Isis: On Waking Up From Your Fear of Academic Writing…

Dr. Isis: On Waking Up From Your Fear of Academic Writing…

While directed at scientists, this post is applicable all academic creatures. Unless you’re a delicate flower & can’t handle profanity…in which case you should read this shit twice because you might actually need an extra dose of Dr. Isis’s character-building ass-kicking. Or not. Whatever. At the end of the day, only you can make you get your work done.