Category Archives: news

More on Mirant

Last night there was a hearing about the [tag]Mirant Power Plant[/tag] in [tag]Alexandria[/tag]. A Washington Post article reported this morning that, “Members of a state environmental panel reviewing Mirant Corp. operations did not show up at a hearing in Alexandria on Monday night, angering City Council members and about 100 residents who had come to testify.”

To make a long and complicated story short and overly simplistic:

The Mirant Power Plant, a coal plant opened in 1949 in the northern section of Alexandria, supplies power to Maryland and the District. In 2005, Mirant’s Potomac River Generating Station was charged with Clean Air Act violations. Mirant conceded in August 1995 that the plant violated Federal Air Quality guidelines and shut down temporarily. As it was a voluntary shutdown, they did not have to meet any standards or make specific changes in order to re-open. They reopened in December 1995, at reduced capacity, after finding a way to change the way they measured the pollutants they were spewing (which is much easier than actually improving the plant).

Pepco has complained for years that Maryland and the District need this plant and always act as though the issue is a surprise from left-field that they can’t possibly address overnight. Of course they can’t. But they’ve complained for many years, and by now could have solved the problem if they’d really wanted to. Instead, they wait until their interests are threatened and then use the “emergency” situation to, for an example from November 2005, press the District Government to waive certain procedural requirements so that the transmission lines could be constructed on an expedited basis.

In March 2006 the EPA gave Mirant permission to operate at full capacity again, despite the secrecy shrouding their alleged new method for reducing pollutants. (I see no reason that we shouldn’t have total faith in the coal industry when they say “Just trust us,” do you?) For some reason, State and Local officials, as well as citizens in Northern Virginia, were apoplectic.

At some point Mirant petitioned the FAA to allow them to raise the height of their smokestacks (the plant is directly across the river from National Airport). The FAA said no. Then the FAA said yes. Higher smokestacks means less pollution falls in the immediate vicinity of the plant, but that doesn’t actually reduce the amount of pollution emitted. I have to admit, the status of the smokestack-height issue is unclear to me at this time.

If you think the plant doesn’t spew nasty stuff, I’d suggest parking your car near the plant for a while and then running your hand over it. Or better yet, visit people who live in the area and look at their windows. It’s never been a mystery to long-time Alexandria residents why public housing, homeless shelters, and the like were traditionally clustered in this area.

If you’re looking for corporate information about Mirant, there’s the link to their site. For information from their opponents, StopMirant.com has one of the worst front pages I’ve ever seen, but the informational links on it are useful. You might want to start with the news articles or case files.

more FCC tomfoolery

FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin’s latest proposal regarding relaxing cross-ownership rules sounds pretty rotten. I haven’t yet scrutinized the plan. When I heard that [tag]FCC[/tag] Commissioners [tag]Michael Copps[/tag] and [tag]Jonathan Adelstein[/tag] had strong reservations, it immediately gave me pause.

There’s a short article this morning in the Business section of the Washington Post (How about putting this on the front page where more people will see it?)

“FCC Chief Offers New Plan on Cross-Ownership”

The chairman of the [tag]Federal Communications Commission[/tag] yesterday proposed relaxing an agency rule to allow big-city newspapers to buy the smaller television stations in their markets, a move designed as a compromise in the ongoing issue of corporate control of the airwaves.

The proposal put forward by Chairman [tag]Kevin J. Martin[/tag] appeared to please almost no one — the newspaper industry said it stopped short of helping the ailing print media and anti-consolidation groups said it went too far, with one calling it “yet another massive giveaway to big media.”

Commissioners Copps and Adelstein have a statement on the FCC site, in which they refer to this proposal as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” They go on to state:

The Martin rules are clearly not ready for prime time. Under the Chairman’s timetable, we count 19 working days for public comment. That is grossly insufficient. The American people should have a minimum of 90 days to comment, just as manyMembers of Congress have requested. More importantly, the Commission has yet to finish its Localism proceeding, teed up four years ago, or to forward comprehensive ideas to increase women and minorityownership of broadcast outlets.

There is still time to do this the right way. Congress and the thousands of American
citizens we have talked to want a thoughtful and deliberate rulemaking, not an alarming rush to judgment characterized byinsultinglyshort notices for public hearings, inadequate time for public comment, flawed studies and a tainted peer review process –all designed to make sure that the Chairman can deliver a generous gift to Big Media before the holidays. For the rest of us: a lump of coal.

[tag]StopBigMedia.com[/tag] has been posting updates on these developments since this so-called compromise was announced.

[tag]Reclaim the Media[/tag] has a report on the last public hearing on media consolidation, held last week in Seattle. It drew over 1,100 people many of whom spent hours waiting to testify about the potential impact of changing [tag]media consolidation[/tag] rules.

Yesterday at the FCC

“Critics Turn Out To Protest Media Consolidation”

Even though the media landscape has changed radically since the last time the Federal Communications Commission tried to alter its media-ownership rules, a hearing at the FCC yesterday showed that the debate remains as heated as ever.
[read the whole story here]

I was unable to attend so I have no first-hand accounts for you. I’ll link to others when I see them, though.

As if Jon Stewart wasn't already a hero…

Tonight the [tag]Daily Show[/tag] did a great segment summing up the week of 24 hour cable news coverage buffoonery about the [tag] California wildfires[/tag]. After showing a clip of a Fox News Network anchor speculating that Al Qaeda could be setting or planning to set wildfires as a new form of terrorism, [tag]Jon Stewart[/tag] added, “Or perhaps Al Qaeda is planning to infiltrate a cable news network and staff it with morons.”